Shark attacks are never a happy event. Even if the victim is fortunate enough to survive the encounter, it is typically not without loss or trauma. However, it is a risk that we all accept as we venture out into the ocean. Recently, there was a fatal shark attack in New Caledonia, and shark culls ensued afterward. The attack and the response to it have now caused a great division among authorities and environmentalists.
Videos by Outdoors
Fatal Shark Attack Causes Division As Shark Culls Ensue

The Guardian shared details surrounding this unfortunate fatal shark attack. The outlet shared that “some beaches in areas of New Caledonia are closed to swimming” following the attack. Additionally, “authorities have begun shark culling off the capital, NoumĂ©a, after the fatal attack in the popular tourist spot.”
Shark culling is the intentional, state-sanctioned killing of sharks. It is typically accomplished through nets and baited drum lines. The goal is to minimize shark populations near beaches so that the rates of shark attacks decrease. While authorities claim this is a matter of public safety, the decision has sparked debate among marine conservationists.
After some investigation, authorities believe the victim of the fatal shark attack was attacked by a tiger shark. Additionally, they believe the shark “measured at least three meters.” Currently, the cull specifically targets only tiger and bull sharks off NoumĂ©a’s coastline.
A Heated Debate Ensues
Authorities who called for the shark cull claim that it “was necessary to protect human lives.” The coastline of NoumĂ©a is popular for swimming, boating, and water sports among both residents and tourists. After the fatal shark attack, authorities felt it was no longer safe for people to enjoy the coastline.
Currently, all swimming and water-based activities are banned outside of protected areas. This will remain the case until the culling campaign comes to an end. While authorities are confident in their decision, marine conservationists disagree with the choice. The outlet shared that the “marine conservation organisation, Ensemble Pour La PlanĂ©te (EPLP), called to stop the shark cull.”
In their argument, the organisation argued that “No new independent, scientific studies demonstrate that shark culls reduce the risk of attacks.” Therefore, if it is not proven to assist public safety, the killing of these animals is baseless and cruel. The Guardian shared that this is not the first time the organisation has fought against shark culls.
Apparently, EPLP was successful in a previous court case in 2023, where they challenged a shark cull. Similar to the current situation, the cull was called after a series of shark attacks occurred, including a fatal shark attack. Since the current cull began, “seven tiger sharks and one bull shark have been caught.”